ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Some COVID-19 patients develop respiratory failure requiring admission to intensive care unit (ICU). We aim to evaluate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) post-ICU in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Twenty-one COVID-19 patients were evaluated pre- and post-PR and compared retrospectively to a non-COVID-19 group of 21 patients rehabilitated after ICU admission due to respiratory failure. RESULTS: PR induced greater 6-min walking distance improvement in COVID-19 patients (+205 ± 121 m) than in other respiratory failure patients post-ICU (+93 ± 66 m). The sooner PR was performed post-ICU, the better patients recovered. CONCLUSIONS: PR induced large functional improvements in COVID-19 patients post-ICU although significant physical and psychosocial impairments remained post-PR.
Subject(s)
Breathing Exercises , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy , Recovery of Function , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/rehabilitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Walk TestABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Both physical and mental disorders may be exacerbated in patients with COVID-19 due to the experience of receiving intensive care; undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation, sedation, proning and paralysis. Pulmonary rehabilitation is aimed to improve dyspnoea, relieve anxiety and depression, reduce the incidence of related complications, as well as prevent and improve dysfunction. However, the impact of respiratory rehabilitation on discharged patients with COVID-19 is currently unclear, especially on patients who have been mechanically ventilated over 24 hours. Therefore, we aim to investigate the efficacy of respiratory rehabilitation programmes, initiated after discharge from the intensive care unit, on the physical and mental health and health-related quality of life in critical patients with COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have registered the protocol on PROSPERO and in the process of drafting it, we strictly followed the checklist of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Potocols. We will search the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, VIP information databases and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Additionally, ongoing trials in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN registry will be searched as well. Studies in English or Chinese and from any country will be accepted regardless of study design. Two review authors will independently extract data and assess the quality of included studies. Continuous data are described as standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. Dichotomous data from randomised controlled trials are described as risk ratio(RR) with 95% CIs; otherwise, it is described as odds ratio(OR) with 95% CIs. I2 and the Cochrane's Q statistic will be used to conduct heterogeneity assessment. The quality of evidence of main outcomes will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation(GRADE) criteria. When included studies are sufficient, we will conduct subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis; the publication bias will be statistically analysed using a funnel plot analysis and Egger's test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our review, planning to include published studies, does not need the request to the ethical committee. The final results of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal after completion. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: No patient involved. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020186791.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/rehabilitation , Respiratory Insufficiency/rehabilitation , Respiratory Therapy/methods , COVID-19/complications , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Physical Functional Performance , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Systematic Reviews as TopicABSTRACT
There is a need of consensus about the pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from acute care. To facilitate the knowledge of the evidence and its translation into practice, we developed suggestions based on experts' opinion. A steering committee identified areas and questions sent to experts. Other international experts participated to a RAND Delphi method in reaching consensus and proposing further suggestions. Strong agreement in suggestions was defined when the mean agreement was >7 (1 = no agreement and 9 = maximal agreement). Panelists response rate was >95%. Twenty-three questions from 4 areas: Personnel protection equipment, phenotypes, assessments, interventions, were identified and experts answered with 121 suggestions, 119 of which received high level of concordance. The evidence-based suggestions provide the clinicians with current evidence and clinical experts opinion. This framework can be used to facilitate clinical decision making within the context of the individual patient. Further studies will evaluate the clinical usefulness of these suggestions.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Pneumonia, Viral/rehabilitation , Respiratory Insufficiency/rehabilitation , Respiratory Therapy/methods , Ambulatory Care , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Delphi Technique , Exercise Test , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Italy , Nutritional Status , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2 , Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Respiratory Insufficiency , Respiratory Therapy , Subacute Care , Aged , Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/rehabilitation , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/rehabilitation , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Recovery of Function , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/rehabilitation , Respiratory Therapy/methods , Respiratory Therapy/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Subacute Care/methods , Subacute Care/statistics & numerical data , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Respiratory physiotherapy in patients with COVID-19 infection in acute setting: a Position Paper of the Italian Association of Respiratory Physiotherapists (ARIR) On February 2020, Italy, especially the northern regions, was hit by an epidemic of the new SARS-Cov-2 coronavirus that spread from China between December 2019 and January 2020. The entire healthcare system had to respond promptly in a very short time to an exponential growth of the number of subjects affected by COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) with the need of semi-intensive and intensive care units.